You did it backwards. You're supposed to find the number that can divide into both of the bottom numbers- not the top.Yeah 5/9 is smaller than 3/5. If you multiply the numerators (The top numbers) until you get the same number, the lowest common multiple I'm pretty sure it's called, which is 15, then you multiply the denominators (The bottom numbers) by what you did on the top numbers to get to 15. So in this instance it would be multiplying the 5 by 5 for the 3/5 fraction (As you multiplied 3 by 5 to get 15, you need to do the same to the bottom basically), which the answer would be 25, then you multiply 9 by 3 for 5/9 as you multiplied 5 by 3, and must do the same to the bottom, and you will get 27 as your answer, and since they have the same numerator now and you can accurately compare it, 3/5 would be bigger than 5/9. That's basically a longed out and broken up way of explaining it, I think I'm right on all of that anyway.
Yeah true that's another way of doing it, I've seen it before, It's still the same right answer. I do it a different way to a lot of people, the one trenly showed and you showed are more common than mine, I just taught myself a different way cause I'm strange lol.You did it backwards. You're supposed to find the number that can divide into both of the bottom numbers- not the top.
That would mean that 45 is the number that can divide into both of the bottom numbers (5 and 9 can both divide into 45).
After you've done that- you figure out what you multiplied the bottom number with, in order to get to 45. In this case (for 5/9), in order to get 9 to 45 you multiplied it by 5, therefore, you multiply the top number as well by 5 and get 25/45.
If you do the exact same thing for the 3/5, you should get 27/45.
Now you compare between 27/45 and 25/45 and see which is bigger.
I'm sorry I didn't use mathematical terms, I learn this stuff in Hebrew so I don't know the correct English words for it.
Btw, Scorpian might be right as well, but I've never seen anyone do it the way he did it.
lol I can count to a hundred that's all3/5 is just 60%
While 5/9 is 55%
3/8 is 37.5%
(when scaled to 1)
Why are all of you using rocket Science xD
Zainos needs to teach his Viper betterlol I can count to a hundred that's all
Yup I guess so xDZainos needs to teach his Viper better
Yeah 5/9 is smaller than 3/5. If you multiply the numerators (The top numbers) until you get the same number, the lowest common multiple I'm pretty sure it's called, which is 15, then you multiply the denominators (The bottom numbers) by what you did on the top numbers to get to 15. So in this instance it would be multiplying the 5 by 5 for the 3/5 fraction (As you multiplied 3 by 5 to get 15, you need to do the same to the bottom basically), which the answer would be 25, then you multiply 9 by 3 for 5/9 as you multiplied 5 by 3, and must do the same to the bottom, and you will get 27 as your answer, and since they have the same numerator now and you can accurately compare it, 3/5 would be bigger than 5/9. That's basically a longed out and broken up way of explaining it, I think I'm right on all of that anyway.
So confusing.You did it backwards. You're supposed to find the number that can divide into both of the bottom numbers- not the top.
That would mean that 45 is the number that can divide into both of the bottom numbers (5 and 9 can both divide into 45).
After you've done that- you figure out what you multiplied the bottom number with, in order to get to 45. In this case (for 5/9), in order to get 9 to 45 you multiplied it by 5, therefore, you multiply the top number as well by 5 and get 25/45.
If you do the exact same thing for the 3/5, you should get 27/45.
Now you compare between 27/45 and 25/45 and see which is bigger.
I'm sorry I didn't use mathematical terms, I learn this stuff in Hebrew so I don't know the correct English words for it.
Btw, Scorpian might be right as well, but I've never seen anyone do it the way he did it.
It's something I have to use for maths work from school. I can do my maths homework and do extra learning on it. I know, it sounds boring, but it is actually quite addicting.what is mathletics exactly?